Wednesday, September 28, 2016

For Andy Stanley Tells Us So



My daughter was recently speaking with another millennial about their faith in Jesus. While both women profess to be Christians, my daughter’s friend expressed that she does not feel like she needs to read the Bible. Her main reason is because she finds some of the things in the Bible (particularly the Old Testament) to be offensive. Her conclusion, “After all, wherever two or more are gathered in God’s name, God is there. So, all I need is God, not the Bible.” My wise daughter was quick to ask, “But, where did you read the notion that wherever two or more are gathered in God’s name, God is there?” That is what we call a proverbial checkmate. Needless to say, I am proud to call this woman of God “daughter.” And, God is likewise, if not more, proud. What are we witnessing today among “Christian” circles regarding God’s word? There is a falling away from God and a falling away from the Bible, His word. But, are the two related? The answer is undoubtedly yes.

A high profile example of this is the recent sermon by Andy Stanley, “Who Needs God? The Bible Tells Me So.” Stanley is the Senior Pastor of North Point Community Church in Atlanta, Georgia. He is the famous son of another high profile pastor, Charles Stanley. In this recent sermon, Stanley attempted to address the problem of what he refers to as high numbers of people “de-converting” from Christianity. He credits the primary reason for this de-conversion to our over-reliance on the Bible. Stanley proclaims that the Bible can’t be defended against the truth claims of science, among other things. Further, as an example of how unnecessary such reliance is, Stanley twisted early church history to claim that the early church thrived for hundreds of years without the Bible. In other words, Christians don’t need the Bible. And, our over-reliance on a flawed book is unnecessarily driving people away from Christianity. We will address Stanley’s foolish statements. But, if you think I am misquoting him, you can hear the entire sermon on his website by clicking HERE.

In the sermon, Stanley begins with, “'Jesus loves me this I know, for the Bible tells me so.' That is where our trouble began.” He later contends, “If the Bible is the foundation of your faith, here’s the problem: it is all or nothing. Christianity becomes a fragile, house of cards religion.” And, as he states boldly, “it is next to impossible to defend the entire Bible.” Let’s address these quotes one by one.

Stanley claims that “our trouble began” with “for the Bible tells me so.” So, instead of the Bible tells us so, he attempts to rather persuade us that Andy Stanley tells us so? Do you see the blinded flaw? If not, allow me to expose it further through a series of questions. Apart from this sermon, which of Stanley’s sermons were not based upon the Bible as authority? If it is "all or nothing" then why is Stanley basing his sermons on the Bible? Stanley’s quotes are as bad as the millennial’s that my daughter easily dismissed. Stanley claims our trouble began with “the Bible tells me so.” To which we say, what trouble? We know that Stanley is referring to people supposedly de-converting from Christianity. But, according to whom is that a problem? Is it a problem for God? If not, it is not a problem for us. By the way, the church is not declining globally but advancing and by record numbers with reliance upon the entirety of the Bible. Did Stanley stop and think that maybe the de-converted that he is referring to were never converted to begin with? After all, you can’t lose your salvation. The truth is that if they left the faith, they were never converted to begin with. In other words, “de-conversion” is fiction. And, maybe the church is better off without "members" who can't tolerate God’s word?

To properly address Stanley's claims, we need look no further than the words of Jesus in the Parable of the Sower. And, since Stanley has preached several times on the Parable of the Sower, using its contents and their authority to respond to his claims is fair game. The Parable of the Sower can be found in Matthew 13. And, in Matthew 13:18-23, Jesus explains the parable: “Hear then the parable of the sower: When anyone hears the word of the kingdom and does not understand it, the evil one comes and snatches away what has been sown in his heart. This is what was sown along the path. As for what was sown on rocky ground, this is the one who hears the word and immediately receives it with joy, yet he has no root in himself, but endures for a while, and when tribulation or persecution arises on account of the word, immediately he falls away. As for what was sown among thorns, this is the one who hears the word, but the cares of the world and the deceitfulness of riches choke the word, and it proves unfruitful. As for what was sown on good soil, this is the one who hears the word and understands it. He indeed bears fruit and yields, in one case a hundredfold, in another sixty, and in another thirty.”

The Parable is explained by Jesus to prophetically refer to four types of people who receive the word represented by seed sown on (1) the path, (2) rocky soil, (3) among thorns and on (4) good soil. All four people receive the word of the Kingdom, but three of the four fall away. While Stanley might characterize these three as de-conversions, in truth these three were false positives. These are people who seemed to believe but never committed their lives to God. Someone who leaves the church because of the Bible was never in the church truly. They were never part of the Bride who unconditionally loves Jesus, the Word became flesh. They never committed their lives to Jesus Christ. Said another way, if you leave Jesus, you thereby prove that you never committed your life to Him. You only committed a portion of your life prior to falling away. Post-falling away, your life is not committed at all. That is not life commitment. That is not conversion. True conversion is God's to judge, but it will be manifested by endurance.

Also, notice the use of the “word” in the Parable. This is the Greek word, logos, which is used to refer to all scripture, and even Jesus Himself as God in John 1:1. Secondly, notice that the words of Jesus here are prophetic, even referring to the days in which we are now living - of which Stanley presently preaches. And, to that point, notice what happens to the person who is represented by the rocky ground: “when tribulation or persecution arises on account of the word, immediately he falls away.” Is this not precisely what Stanley should have been referring to when he refers to the de-converted? So, these "rocky ground" people later face persecution over the word, they can’t seem to defend it, and they choose to fall away. The Holy Spirit response is to take this example as reason to stand firm on the word, not justify those who fall away as Stanley attempts to do. After all, the parable is pointing us to be like the fourth soil who never departs from the word regardless of persecution, tribulation, riches, etc. If you fall away on account of the word, it is not the word that has the problem, but he that falls away from it. The Sower and His seed are flawless. It is the soil that is flawed. It is not the word of God that we should therefore run away from. Rather, God's word is the very bread of life that we need to survive every day. In fact, it was Jesus Himself when tempted to turn stones to bread who responded to Lucifer in Matthew 4:4 (thereby reciting Deuteronomy 8:3), “It is written, ‘Man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that comes from the mouth of God.’” Where else do we have such word to consume but in the Bible? Need we say more?

With regards to the veracity of the Bible which Stanley attempted to denounce, I will here repeat what I posted a couple weeks ago regarding the progressive church movement: “The sad irony is that if we measure ourselves against the veracity of the Bible, it is we who are intellectually lacking, not the Bible. It is we who are obscure, wavering and lacking in integrity, not the Bible. The Bible is far more intellectually superior than we are. The scientific discoveries revealed on its pages prior to their credited discovery by man speak to its humanity-surpassing truth. And, the Bible’s thousands of prophecies fulfilled hundreds of years after being spoken prove its supernatural spirituality. Any man who puts his intellect in judgment of the Bible’s content so declares himself a fool before both God and man.” Stanley does not measure up. Even 1,000 Andy Stanleys combined are nowhere near the Bible's level of veracity. You can add to that all of the world’s scholars and the Bible’s veracity far exceeds their combination. Stanley’s sermon is a bold and liberal attempt to transfer authority to something other than the Bible. But, there is no such authority physically available to man that transcends it, including Stanley's flawed opinions.

As Dr. Al Mohler eloquently responded to Stanley, “And what is our alternative? Are we to believe that those who are ‘de-converting’ from Christianity can be weaned off of the Bible and on to some other sufficient authority? … an attempt to rescue Christianity from its dependence upon Scripture is doomed to disaster…If Scripture cannot be trusted, then we are doomed.” A religion that is loosely based upon scripture will not convert anyone to the God of scripture. In John 5:39 Jesus even said, “You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; and it is they that bear witness about me.” Isn’t Jesus practically saying, believe in me because the Bible tells you so?

In conclusion, de-conversion is not "our trouble". Further, none of our troubles begin with reliance on scripture for that is what our spiritual life depends upon. In fact, falling away from scripture and justifying such falling away is where our troubles do in fact begin. The irony is that Stanley’s sermon represents precisely the origin of all troubles – disrespect of God’s word. That was proven in Eden and echoed throughout history including today, even from the mouths of so called pastors. Here is a wiser teaching: Any pastor who addresses the Bible's veracity by in any way repeating the words of Lucifer, “Did God actually say…?” – his sermon should be completely dismissed.


You can purchase the book "Reason If You Will - How To Answer Questions Regarding Faith" by clicking HERE. Profits go to Camp Bahamas. You can also follow @ReasonIfYouWill on Twitter.

Wednesday, September 21, 2016

Globalism Versus God



There has been a fair amount of discussion in the media lately regarding political events through the lens of the ongoing struggle between globalism versus nationalism. You see this struggle in how political foes are pitted against each other by their platforms and by pundits. We even saw this struggle in the recent stunning Brexit vote earlier this year. The Brexit vote was when the people of Great Britain voted to exit the European Union to become a sovereign nation once again. And, the globalists fought this notion with full vigor. Do you understand what globalism and nationalism each represent? Do you know which position is aligned with God?

Globalism is defined as the political policy of placing the interests of the entire world above those of individual nations. It is a national policy of treating the whole world as the proper sphere for political influence. This sounds non-threatening. But, Globalism is the failed liberal authoritarian desire for a "one world" view that rejects the important role of nations in protecting values and encouraging productivity. For example, we see this manifested in America by taking American tax dollars to build other nations without proper deference to our own. But, since globalism openly opposes nationalism, globalism is arguably anti-American. To the American globalist, America is secondary at best. But, more importantly for the Christian, globalism is in fact anti-God.

Before we prove that last statement, let’s address the criticism of nationalists made by globalists. For example, globalists of all political stripes are quick to point out that Hitler was a nationalist. But, that is deceptive distortion and an example of the logical fallacy of argument to the man. Yes, Hitler was a nationalist, but nationalism was not what made Hitler evil. It was his socialism and racist authoritarianism that combined to fuel his bloody evil. In fact, the Allied Forces who combined to defeat him were made up of individual sovereign nations who also valued nationalism, and who each after the war never stopped valuing their individual nationalism. In truth, there is nothing wrong with wanting to be a sovereign nation. That is in fact how America and every other nation was formed, and the basis upon which they have all since been defended. When nationalism is kept in proper subordination to individual freedom, evil can be kept in check. It is only when individual freedom is abridged in deference to nationalism that the problems arise. But, those problems arise under any political construct because of the abridging of individual rights, not because of the political construct.

In the debate between globalism and nationalism, globalism is the polar opposite of individual freedom, national freedom and fiscal conservatism. Globalism is also the polar opposite of representative or republican democracy. Globalism promotes the centralization or consolidation of power not the separation of power. Centralization of power results in oligarchy and/or dictatorship, both of which are the epitome of corruption against the interest of the governed (we the people). Decentralization of power ensures that power remains as close to the people as possible, thereby ensuring the protection of their interests. The further power is removed from the people, the more distant such power is from people’s interests. And, if power is both distant and centralized, corruption against the will of the people is a deadly certainty. Globalism is surrendering our sovereign and civil rights as a country to someone else, which always results in the surrendering of our individual rights as well. Globalism is a threat to our freedoms, especially religious freedom. Therefore, it is decentralization of power, as explicitly intended by our Founders and Framers that should be every Christian voter’s goal.

How can we make that claim? Globalism is entirely opposed to God and what God values. The ultimate goal of globalism is logically towards a one-world government or global citizenry. But a one-world government is what every freedom-loving Christian should oppose. The book of Revelations points out that such a one-world system will be precisely that which enables global rebellion against God. Why else do you think the ultimate prophecies from both Daniel and Revelations all point to an evil form of government controlling trade even on a local level, as opposed to freedom in local trade? In Revelation chapter 13, the “beast” is described in verse 3, “the whole earth marveled as they followed the beast.” Further, in verses 7-8, “Also [the beast] was allowed to make war on the saints and to conquer them. And authority was given it over every tribe and people and language and nation, and all who dwell on earth will worship it.” Notice the words “whole earth…followed” and “authority was given it over every tribe and people and language and nation.” That is the worst form of one-world government. This passage is explicitly describing globalism.

This rebellious form is not new in Revelations. It is seen as clearly near the beginning of Bible as it is at the end. Such Biblical symmetry is quite telling. It was God who created nations dating back to Babel. Genesis 11:9 says, “Therefore its name was called Babel, because there the Lord confused the language of all the earth. And from there the Lord dispersed them over the face of all the earth.” Since God thereby created the notion of nations, individual national sovereignty is a good thing sanctioned by God Himself. And its opposite, globalism, has no history apart from Godless rebellion. And, remember that Babel is also known as the city of Babylon and the “beast” in Revelations is also known as the “Whore of Babylon” – again, symmetry. The advance towards the erasure of national borders and infringement of national sovereignty has always opposed God. Who changed their languages and dispersed them geographically? God did. To undo what God has done is not wise. And, every instance of globalism results in rebellious arrogance that attempts to assault God.

The specific freedoms that are the first to likely be abridged by globalism will be speech and religious liberty. As this blog has pointed out before, the highest ranking election issue for God is religious freedom (see HERE). Therefore, I urge every Christian to vote and oppose every candidate who advocates for globalism. I encourage every Christian to oppose every candidate who opposes religious freedom. I encourage every Christian to oppose every candidate who defends the current corrupt political establishment and its corrupt media. Christian, the ballot box is our primary political means to speak for God and the values that are most important to Him. Get aligned with Him above all else.


You can purchase the book "Reason If You Will - How To Answer Questions Regarding Faith" by clicking HERE. Profits go to Camp Bahamas. You can also follow @ReasonIfYouWill on Twitter.

Wednesday, September 14, 2016

You Can Kneel For Anything Except God



It is another fall semester and the rabid advance against religious freedom hastens. A typical and recent example is the University of Nebraska Lincoln. At the opening of its fall semester, its newly installed Chancellor, Ronnie Green, informed the students of the University’s "nonnegotiable" “belief statements” regarding "values acceptance." “We insist on a culture of respect … We do not tolerate actions of hate and disrespect.” However, throughout his entire speech, Green failed to share any clarifying examples. I wonder why? And, he closed by saying, “We take action when we observe something or someone being treated unfairly or in a demeaning manner.” These “belief statements” were reinforced in a memo to the students and a posting on the school website. It is well known that UNL has been on a liberal trajectory for quite some time. Needless to say, these comments come as Christian beliefs are accused of being intolerant, hateful, and racist on campuses nationwide.

Before we examine the hypocrisy of our culture in this, there is plenty of hypocrisy in Green’s statements all by themselves. For example, his nonnegotiable values are in the form of “belief statements” while the school objects to the belief statements that are nonnegotiable for Christians. That is an example of not accepting the values of others. They say their priority is values acceptance, while they reject the values of Christians with prejudice. What about tolerating Christians by respecting their values? Also, did you notice how they are “belief statements” and not declarations of fact? Isn't belief religion? I digress. Apparently, the University insists on a culture of respect … except towards Christians. They don’t tolerate actions of hate and disrespect … unless they are directed at Christians. They take action when they observe someone being treated unfairly or in a demeaning manner ... unless that someone is a Christian. Christians are being systematically silenced, flunked, expelled and openly persecuted on college campuses nationwide … all in the name of respect. It never dawns on these oppressors and their fans that such actions are disrespectful to Christians. This is how blind we have become.

And, that brings us to Colin Kaepernick. Kaepernick is an NFL football player for the San Francisco 49ers. And, at the opening of the season, in keeping with the spirit of the ill-founded Black Lives Matter movement, he decided to refuse to stand during our national anthem while everyone else in the entire stadium sought to express American unity and equality. Kaepernick, however, would rather draw attention to himself, divide us, and support the false agenda that condemns America as a bad actor on the world stage in the category of being systemically oppressive to people of color. Aside from the obvious fact that America is the most freedom-loving country that statistically provides more opportunities to people of all ethnical backgrounds than any other country on the planet, because she is imperfect by Kaepernick's standards, he will not stand in unity with the rest of us. Kaepernick thereby decides to disrespect our flag, disrespect our police officers and disrespect our veterans. And, he also disrespects the rest of us simply trying to experience a peaceful and respectful unity for just three minutes before a game void of divisive politics.  


And, guess how Liberals (like Chancellor Green) feel about Kaepernick’s acts of disrespect, division and not accepting our values personified in singing our national anthem? Well, to the left, Kaepernick is a hero. But, Keapernick's influence did not stop there. This foolish act of disrespectful division over a false agenda was followed by Brendon Marshall of the Denver Broncos and then by four players from the Miami Dolphins. And, this failure of immature non-leadership did not stop there. It was also foolishly followed by a number of high school and even middle school football teams across the country over this past weekend. To Kaepernick and his foolish followers, I pose a simple question: if America is so oppressive to minorities, and more so than other countries, then name just one country that statistically scores more favorable to America when it comes to freedom, opportunity and prosperity realized by minorities. Just name one that is better. Hint: there isn’t one. And, there is no perfect country that lacks racism in its past. Newsflash: humans have always been immoral. But, you can’t name one country that is more moral on this subject today than America over the past 60 years. We will fight for Kaepernick's freedom of expression, but we will not excuse the lack of intellectual, moral and visual integrity on top of disgraceful leadership. If being disrespectful is nonnegotiable intolerance according to the left, then why is disrespect of our intelligence, our beliefs, our peaceful moments of unity and equality heralded by them?

While we are on the subject of football and taking a knee before NFL games, let’s contrast the treatment of another player who did so – Tim Tebow. Tebow, an openly devout Christian, routinely took a knee before every NFL game to pray to God for the safety of all the players, etc. For this act of courageous love towards the other players, guess how the left treated this football player for taking a knee? You guessed it – he was so shunned that, in spite of dramatically reversing the failing Denver Broncos in his rookie year back to playoff victory, he was ultimately blackballed out of the sport altogether. The double standard is clear. The hypocrisy is clear. The disrespect is clear. The demeaning of values is clear. You can apparently kneel for anything except God. You have freedom of expression except for God. I remind every reader that true oppression begins with suppressing basic rights like freedom of speech and religious expression. Kaepernick enjoys free speech while Christians on college campuses do not. How is that for upside down? Remember, religious freedom is the first in the Bill of Rights, even explicitly cited.

The fact that people are not moved by the obvious is further sign that spiritual blindness is spreading rampantly. That means it will probably keep getting worse. In John 15:18, Jesus famously said, “If the world hates you, know that it has hated me before it hated you…If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you.” Jesus laid out the truth test for His claims to be God in the form of prophecy. That was bold 2,000 years ago. As His prophecy becomes remarkably true, so proven are His truth claims. If history since Jesus is an accurate guide, God’s true church will be either physically or financially forced underground even in the West, as it was thus persecuted throughout history in nearly every advanced civilization between phases of national prosperity and national downfall. But, this gives Christians reason to have hope. First, we have hope because we know how this ends. Second, we have hope because in history this is always followed by church awakening, revival and profound effectiveness. The third reason why this gives us hope is because our faith is reinforced as true with every act of hateful hypocrisy. We are watching the prophecy of Jesus unfold before our eyes in ways only God could have known 2,000 years ago. The blindness defies logic, but enables fulfillment of Christianity-affirming prophecy. Nobody other than God could have predicted that only one religion would be so blindly and universally persecuted. All the while, nobody seems to wonder why. Keep the faith and embrace His hope.


You can purchase the book "Reason If You Will - How To Answer Questions Regarding Faith" by clicking HERE. Profits go to Camp Bahamas. You can also follow @ReasonIfYouWill on Twitter.